Gov. Rick Perry could say – and probablywill – that he nailed it.In his State of the State speech to the Legislature last winter, Perry fingered the federal Environmental Protection Agency as a potential cause of grief to the state. “Unfortunately,” he said, “our strength in petrochemical production and refining makes us a big target on the radar of an increasingly activist [read: newly controlled-by-Democrats] EPA, whose one-size-fits-all approaches could severely harm our energy sector; an agency whose potential to harm our state with punitive actions will only increase in the months and years to come.”
And sure enough…
Here’s the Associated Press on Sept. 8: “The air-pollution permitting process in the nation’s largest greenhouse-gas producing state does not adhere to the Clean Air Act and portions of it should be thrown out, federal regulators said Tuesday in an announcement applauded by Texas environmentalists.”
It’s a complicated story, as are most narratives concerning the federal government’s renewed — what with a new administration in power – quest to root out “polluters.” Texas has a previously okayed system of flexible permits, which system lets polluters exceed emission limits here and there provided an overall emissions average is reached. EPA, now headed by ex-New Jersey clean air enforcer Lisa P. Jackson, plans a comment period of 60 days for new regulations that it plans to strap on the state in the coming year.
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has seen this confrontation coming on. Says TCEQ executive director Mark Vickery: “Now that the EPA has placed its cards on the table and we finally know what specific objections they have with our programs, we look forward to working with them to resolve outstanding issues. We hope the EPA will consider the actual emission reductions achieved through our state programs and will continue to build on these successes.”
Well, maybe. On the other hand, Public Citizen, the Naderite lobby, likens EPA’s announcement to the proclamation of “the day of reckoning that we’ve known has been coming.” Look for tighter regulations, stronger pressure on industry – and, for Texas, the economic heebie-jeebies. Perry justifiably notes the connection between the state’s relative prosperity and its delicate embrace of industries that, gee whiz, pollute. It’s the price of progress – a matter to be weighed and balanced in democratic forums where the necessities both of economic growth and clean air find hearings. The EPA, a bureaucracy of bureaucracy, hardly qualifies as a democratic forum.
Watch for court action. Watch first for political fallout. Perry will rightly suggest, and more than suggest, that Obama-style clampdown on refineries, petrochemical plants, and coal-fired power plants is sure to drive up the cost of power for Texans, and thus put their state more on a level with less prosperous states, such as California.
Speaking of the Golden State…you may recall its recent law stipulating that cars sold in California must be 40 percent cleaner and more fuel-efficient by 2016. So taken with the idea is the Obama administration that it wants the whole nation to copy it – never mind the lunacy of jacking up car prices at a time relatively few
Americans (sans government “clunker” subsidies) feel like paying for new cars. One can’t wait to see how our federally controlled auto companies, GM and Chrysler, are going to respond to the challenge. EPA administrator Jackson, while running the environmental show in New Jersey, joined a suit against the late Bush administration for blocking states from enacting tougher standards than the EPA mandates. I believe the relevant warning at this point is, Katy bar the door.
That’s not reckoning, of course, with Texans’ fundamental indisposition to being shoved around by Higher Authorities. It’s a safe bet that the Governor, having issued a jeremiad concerning the EPA’s intentions, will take steps to resist. In fact, he will love it. First, because he doesn’t cotton, basically, to federal interference in state affairs; second, because it gives him the chance to tickle voter sentiment, this year and next, about threats to Texas prosperity.
The Governor can’t file lawsuits. That’s the province of the Attorney General, but one would be justified probably in supposing that the State won’t go gently into the non-polluted, economically darkened night envisioned by the Obama administration and its Environmental Protection Agency. Which affray, by the way, is one more reminder of what lies in store for economic standouts like Texas in a world against the backdrop of deprivation and agony in states – like California – more in tune philosophically with the new federal regime. The standouts are going to stand out by virtue of the federal tendency to pick on them so as to pull them down to a more acceptable level of growth and prosperity.
Of course it doesn’t make sense! Pull down your standouts? It’s never made sense. But the impulse seems embedded in a certain kind human nature, and now in the power exercised by a government whose consistent them seems to be that too many people have too much of whatever. That means us, fellow Texans.